I was shocked to see no coverage at all of the Jena 6.
So I thought I'd do a little experiment, to see whether the newsies think people are more interested in OJ Simpson, or in a new chapter in the ongoing struggle for African American civil rights.
Google News (which is a highly balanced aggregator of diverse sources), offers me 15,599 results for OJ Simpson.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01610/0161065804f96f09c29024c8b7924625f24e3ca6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4378/b437843fb5744e3633eadfbe947610512fbeb711" alt=""
How did the Jena 6 fare? Well, Google informs me there are 3,465 pieces. Apparently OJ's antics are just that much more interesting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccdb8/ccdb81a2abac7db8a773b12993c6a43f44d2cace" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05231/052316f4e587ae5e2b3afd0da8e15740a9b02a7f" alt=""
This of course should lead any thinking person to question why one is considered newsworthy and the other is not.
See my first Media Face Off: China's Stock Market vs. Migrant Workers.